1
Aveyard, H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. Fourth edition. London, England: : McGraw Hill Education 2019. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989
2
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: : Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
3
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students. Exeter: : Learning Matters 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
4
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. The research process in nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: : Wiley Blackwell 2015. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
5
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. Fifth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: : Wiley 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418
6
Parahoo, K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
7
CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme). http://www.casp-uk.net/
8
Centre for Health Evidence. https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109
9
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/
10
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). http://www.nice.org.uk/
11
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students. Exeter: : Learning Matters 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
12
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: : Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
13
Parahoo, K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
14
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard 2006;20:41–5.https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
15
Hewitt-Taylor, J. Evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard 2002;17:47–52.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320
16
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. Who am I and what am I doing? Becoming a qualitative research interviewer. Nurse Researcher 2010;17:7–16.https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741
17
Holloway, I. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Fourth edition. Chichester, England: : Wiley Blackwell 2017. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
18
Szyjka, S. Understanding reseach paradigms: trends in science education research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 2012;43:110–8.https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live
19
Vogt, W.P. Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: : SAGE 2005. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml
20
Ingham-Broomfield, R. A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008;26:102–9.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375
21
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice. British Journal of Social Work 2011;41:1176–97.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372
22
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation. Nurse Education Today 2011;31:e1–7.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954
23
Hek, G. Evidence-based practice: finding the evidence. Journal of Community Nursing 2000;14:19–22.
24
Cranston, M. Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard 2002;16:39–43.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161
25
Meadows, K.A. So you want to do research? 1: an overview of the research process. British Journal Of Community Nursing 2003;8:369–75.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984
26
Improving the quality of quantitative research reports: A call for action. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2011;22:387–94.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658
27
Rolfe, R. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006;53:304–10.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776
28
Facchiano L, Hoffman Snyder C. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part three: Critical appraisal process. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2012;24:704–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00752.x
29
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. Supporting evidence-based service delivery and organisation: a comparison of an emergent realistic appraisal technique with a standard qualitative critical appraisal tool. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 2007;5:477–86.https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x
30
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. First day in clinical practice: Evaluating stress of nursing students and their ways to cope with it. Healthmed Published Online First: 2012.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it
31
Coolican, H. Research methods and statistics in psychology. Seventh edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945
32
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. The research process in nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: : Wiley Blackwell 2015. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
33
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Fourth edition. Ames, Iowa: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
34
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing 2007;16:658–63.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395
35
Goodman, B. Crunch the numbers. Nursing Standard 2008;22:49–49.https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site
36
Jamieson, S. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education 2004;38:1217–8.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461
37
Lee, P. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Nursing Times 2006;102:28–30.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
38
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard 2006;20:41–5.https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
39
Thomas, E. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: describing and presenting data. Musculoskeletal Care 2004;2:218–28.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079
40
Thomas, E. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: Hypothesis tests and estimation. Musculoskeletal Care 2005;3:102–8.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543
41
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006;21:656–60.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012
42
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. Reflecting on nurses’ views on using research in practice. British Journal of Nursing 2012;21:1341–6.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486
43
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html
44
Phillips, J. Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems. Nursing Times 2013;109:18–20.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
45
Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Planning tools: Problem Tree Analysis. http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis
46
Value Based Management.net. Summary of McKinsey’s 7S model. http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html
47
De Montfort University. How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects. http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf
48
University of Reading. Doing your literature search. http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx
49
CASP International. www.caspinternational.org. http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf
50
Checklist - Evaluating qualitative research studies. http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf
51
Anderson, C. Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2010;74:1–7.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069
52
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. Evaluating research in academic journals: a practical guide to realistic evaluation. Seventh edition. New York: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225
53
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. How to conduct an effective literature search. (cover story). Nursing Standard 2005;20:41–7.https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
54
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ 1997;315:305–8.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305
55
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper : getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ 1997;315:243–6.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243
56
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: The Medline database. BMJ 1997;315:180–3.https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760
57
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ 1997;315:364–6.https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364
58
Ellis, P. Evidence-based practice in nursing. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: : Learning Matters 2019.
59
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: : Learning Matters 2018.
60
Motulsky, H. Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking. Third edition. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014.
61
Moule, P. Making sense of research in nursing, health and social care. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
62
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. Nursing research: an introduction. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2017.
63
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Ninth edition. Philadelphia: : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017.
64
Polit, D.F. Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Tenth edit. Philadelphia: : Wolters Kluwer Health 2017.
65
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. Understanding nursing research: using research in evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: : Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2011.
66
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. The SAGE dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2016.
