1.
Aveyard, H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide [Internet]. Fourth edition. London, England: McGraw Hill Education; 2019. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989
2.
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses [Internet]. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
3.
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students [Internet]. Exeter: Learning Matters; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
4.
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. The research process in nursing [Internet]. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2015. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
5.
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine [Internet]. Fifth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418
6.
Parahoo, K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues [Internet]. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
7.
CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/
8.
Centre for Health Evidence [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109
9.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York [Internet]. Available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/
10.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) [Internet]. NICE; Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/
11.
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students [Internet]. Exeter: Learning Matters; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
12.
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses [Internet]. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
13.
Parahoo, K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues [Internet]. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
14.
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard [Internet]. 2006;20(44):41–5. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
15.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. Evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard [Internet]. 2002;17(14):47–52. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320
16.
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. Who am I and what am I doing? Becoming a qualitative research interviewer. Nurse Researcher [Internet]. 2010;17(3):7–16. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741
17.
Holloway, I. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
18.
Szyjka, S. Understanding reseach paradigms: trends in science education research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century [Internet]. 2012;43:110–8. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live
19.
Vogt, W.P. Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences [Internet]. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2005. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml
20.
Ingham-Broomfield, R. A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2008;26(1):102–9. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375
21.
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice. British Journal of Social Work [Internet]. 2011;41(6):1176–97. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372
22.
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation. Nurse Education Today [Internet]. 2011;31(8):e1–7. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954
23.
Hek, G. Evidence-based practice: finding the evidence. Journal of Community Nursing. 2000;14(11):19–22.
24.
Cranston, M. Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard [Internet]. 2002;16(24):39–43. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161
25.
Meadows, K.A. So you want to do research? 1: an overview of the research process. British Journal Of Community Nursing [Internet]. 2003;8(8):369–75. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984
26.
Improving the quality of quantitative research reports: A call for action. Human Resource Development Quarterly [Internet]. 2011;22(4):387–94. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658
27.
Rolfe, R. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2006;53(3):304–10. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776
28.
Facchiano L, Hoffman Snyder C. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part three: Critical appraisal process. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2012 Dec;24(12):704–15.
29.
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. Supporting evidence-based service delivery and organisation: a comparison of an emergent realistic appraisal technique with a standard qualitative critical appraisal tool. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare [Internet]. 2007;5(4):477–86. Available from: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x
30.
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. First day in clinical practice: Evaluating stress of nursing students and their ways to cope with it. Healthmed [Internet]. 2012; Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it
31.
Coolican, H. Research methods and statistics in psychology [Internet]. Seventh edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945
32.
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. The research process in nursing [Internet]. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2015. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
33.
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare [Internet]. Fourth edition. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
34.
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing [Internet]. 2007;16(11):658–63. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395
35.
Goodman, B. Crunch the numbers. Nursing Standard [Internet]. 2008;22(29):49–49. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site
36.
Jamieson, S. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education [Internet]. 2004;38(12):1217–8. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461
37.
Lee, P. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Nursing Times [Internet]. 2006;102(28):28–30. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
38.
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard [Internet]. 2006;20(44):41–5. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
39.
Thomas, E. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: describing and presenting data. Musculoskeletal Care [Internet]. 2004;2(4):218–28. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079
40.
Thomas, E. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: Hypothesis tests and estimation. Musculoskeletal Care [Internet]. 2005;3(2):102–8. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543
41.
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. Journal of General Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2006;21(6):656–60. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012
42.
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. Reflecting on nurses’ views on using research in practice. British Journal of Nursing [Internet]. 2012;21(22):1341–6. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486
43.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys [Internet]. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html
44.
Phillips, J. Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems. Nursing Times [Internet]. 2013;109(15):18–20. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
45.
Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Planning tools: Problem Tree Analysis [Internet]. Available from: http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis
46.
Value Based Management.net. Summary of McKinsey’s 7S model [Internet]. Available from: http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html
47.
De Montfort University. How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects [Internet]. Available from: http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf
48.
University of Reading. Doing your literature search [Internet]. Available from: http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx
49.
CASP International. www.caspinternational.org [Internet]. Available from: http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf
50.
Checklist - Evaluating qualitative research studies [Internet]. Available from: http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf
51.
Anderson, C. Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education [Internet]. 2010;74(8):1–7. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069
52.
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. Evaluating research in academic journals: a practical guide to realistic evaluation [Internet]. Seventh edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225
53.
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. How to conduct an effective literature search. (cover story). Nursing Standard [Internet]. 2005;20(11):41–7. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
54.
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ [Internet]. 1997;315(7103):305–8. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305
55.
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper : getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ [Internet]. 1997;315(7102):243–6. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243
56.
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: The Medline database. BMJ [Internet]. 1997;315(7101):180–3. Available from: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760
57.
Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ [Internet]. 1997;315(7104):364–6. Available from: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364
58.
Ellis, P. Evidence-based practice in nursing. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters; 2019.
59.
Ellis, P. Understanding research for nursing students. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters; 2018.
60.
Motulsky, H. Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking. Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
61.
Moule, P. Making sense of research in nursing, health and social care. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
62.
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. Nursing research: an introduction. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2017.
63.
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Ninth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
64.
Polit, D.F. Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Tenth edit. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.
65.
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. Understanding nursing research: using research in evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
66.
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. The SAGE dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2016.
