[1]
Anderson, C. 2010. Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74, 8 (2010), 1–7.
[2]
Aveyard, H. 2019. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. McGraw Hill Education.
[3]
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. 2010. Who am I and what am I doing? Becoming a qualitative research interviewer. Nurse Researcher. 17, 3 (2010), 7–16.
[4]
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. 2011. Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation. Nurse Education Today. 31, 8 (2011), e1–e7.
[5]
CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme): http://www.casp-uk.net/.
[6]
CASP International www.caspinternational.org.
[7]
Centre for Health Evidence: https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109.
[8]
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York: http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/.
[9]
Coolican, H. 2019. Research methods and statistics in psychology. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[10]
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. 2007. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing. 16, 11 (2007), 658–663.
[11]
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. 2011. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier.
[12]
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. 2011. The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier.
[13]
Cranston, M. 2002. Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard. 16, 24 (2002), 39–43.
[14]
De Montfort University How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects.
[15]
Doing your literature search: http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx.
[16]
Ellis, P. 2019. Evidence-based practice in nursing. Learning Matters.
[17]
Ellis, P. 2010. Understanding research for nursing students. Learning Matters.
[18]
Ellis, P. 2010. Understanding research for nursing students. Learning Matters.
[19]
Ellis, P. 2018. Understanding research for nursing students. Learning Matters.
[20]
Facchiano, L. and Hoffman Snyder, C. 2012. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part three: Critical appraisal process. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 24, 12 (Dec. 2012), 704–715. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00752.x.
[21]
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. 2015. The research process in nursing. Wiley Blackwell.
[22]
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. 2015. The research process in nursing. Wiley Blackwell.
[23]
Goodman, B. 2008. Crunch the numbers. Nursing Standard. 22, 29 (2008), 49–49.
[24]
Greenhalgh, T. 1997. How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ. 315, 7103 (1997), 305–308.
[25]
Greenhalgh, T. 1997. How to read a paper : getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ. 315, 7102 (1997), 243–246.
[26]
Greenhalgh, T. 1997. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ. 315, 7104 (1997), 364–366.
[27]
Greenhalgh, T. 2014. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. Wiley.
[28]
Greenhalgh, T. 1997. How to read a paper: The Medline database. BMJ. 315, 7101 (1997), 180–183.
[29]
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. 2012. Reflecting on nurses’ views on using research in practice. British Journal of Nursing. 21, 22 (2012), 1341–1346.
[30]
Hek, G. 2000. Evidence-based practice: finding the evidence. Journal of Community Nursing. 14, 11 (2000), 19–22.
[31]
Hewitt-Taylor, J. 2002. Evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard. 17, 14 (2002), 47–52.
[32]
Holloway, I. 2017. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Wiley Blackwell.
[33]
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. 2017. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[34]
Ingham-Broomfield, R. 2008. A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26, 1 (2008), 102–109.
[35]
Jamieson, S. 2004. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education. 38, 12 (2004), 1217–1218.
[36]
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. 2012. First day in clinical practice: Evaluating stress of nursing students and their ways to cope with it. Healthmed. (2012).
[37]
Lee, P. 2006. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Nursing Times. 102, 28 (2006), 28–30.
[38]
Meadows, K.A. 2003. So you want to do research? 1: an overview of the research process. British Journal Of Community Nursing. 8, 8 (2003), 369–375.
[39]
Motulsky, H. 2014. Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking. Oxford University Press.
[40]
Moule, P. 2015. Making sense of research in nursing, health and social care. SAGE.
[41]
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. 2017. Nursing research: an introduction. SAGE.
[42]
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): http://www.nice.org.uk/.
[43]
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. 2011. The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice. British Journal of Social Work. 41, 6 (2011), 1176–1197.
[44]
Parahoo, K. 2014. Nursing research: principles, process and issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[45]
Parahoo, K. 2014. Nursing research: principles, process and issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[46]
Phillips, J. 2013. Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems. Nursing Times. 109, 15 (2013), 18–20.
[47]
Planning tools: Problem Tree Analysis: http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis.
[48]
Polit, D.F. 2017. Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer Health.
[49]
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. 2017. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[50]
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. 2019. Evaluating research in academic journals: a practical guide to realistic evaluation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[51]
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. 2011. Understanding nursing research: using research in evidence-based practice. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[52]
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. 2006. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard. 20, 44 (2006), 41–45.
[53]
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. 2006. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard. 20, 44 (2006), 41–45.
[54]
Rolfe, R. 2006. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 53, 3 (2006), 304–310.
[55]
Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html.
[56]
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. 2007. Supporting evidence-based service delivery and organisation: a comparison of an emergent realistic appraisal technique with a standard qualitative critical appraisal tool. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 5, 4 (2007), 477–486.
[57]
Summary of McKinsey’s 7S model: http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html.
[58]
Szyjka, S. 2012. Understanding reseach paradigms: trends in science education research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 43, (2012), 110–118.
[59]
Thomas, E. 2004. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: describing and presenting data. Musculoskeletal Care. 2, 4 (2004), 218–228.
[60]
Thomas, E. 2005. An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: Hypothesis tests and estimation. Musculoskeletal Care. 3, 2 (2005), 102–108.
[61]
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. 2005. How to conduct an effective literature search. (cover story). Nursing Standard. 20, 11 (2005), 41–47.
[62]
Vogt, W.P. 2005. Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. SAGE.
[63]
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. 2016. The SAGE dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. SAGE.
[64]
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. 2006. A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 21, 6 (2006), 656–660.
[65]
Checklist - Evaluating qualitative research studies.
[66]
2011. Improving the quality of quantitative research reports: A call for action. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 22, 4 (2011), 387–394.