Anderson, C. (2010). Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 1–7. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069
Aveyard, H. (2019). Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide (Fourth edition). McGraw Hill Education. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. (2010). Who am I and what am I doing? Becoming a qualitative research interviewer. Nurse Researcher, 17(3), 7–16. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. (2011). Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), e1–e7. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954
CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme). (n.d.). http://www.casp-uk.net/
CASP International. (n.d.-a). www.caspinternational.org. http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf
Centre for Health Evidence. (n.d.). https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York. (n.d.). http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/
Checklist - Evaluating qualitative research studies. (n.d.). http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf
Coolican, H. (2019). Research methods and statistics in psychology (Seventh edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 658–663. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. (2011a). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses (3rd ed). Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. (2011b). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses (3rd ed). Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
Cranston, M. (2002). Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard, 16(24), 39–43. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161
De Montfort University. (n.d.-b). How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects. http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf
Ellis, P. (2010a). Understanding research for nursing students. Learning Matters. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
Ellis, P. (2010b). Understanding research for nursing students. Learning Matters. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
Ellis, P. (2018). Understanding research for nursing students (Fourth edition). Learning Matters.
Ellis, P. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing (Fourth edition). Learning Matters.
Facchiano, L., & Hoffman Snyder, C. (2012). Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part three: Critical appraisal process. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(12), 704–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00752.x
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. (2015a). The research process in nursing (Seventh edition). Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. (2015b). The research process in nursing (Seventh edition). Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
Goodman, B. (2008). Crunch the numbers. Nursing Standard, 22(29), 49–49. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site
Greenhalgh, T. (1997a). How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ, 315(7103), 305–308. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305
Greenhalgh, T. (1997b). How to read a paper : getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ, 315(7102), 243–246. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243
Greenhalgh, T. (1997c). How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ, 315(7104), 364–366. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364
Greenhalgh, T. (1997d). How to read a paper: The Medline database. BMJ, 315(7101), 180–183. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760
Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine (Fifth edition). Wiley. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. (2012). Reflecting on nurses’ views on using research in practice. British Journal of Nursing, 21(22), 1341–1346. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486
Hek, G. (2000). Evidence-based practice: finding the evidence. Journal of Community Nursing, 14(11), 19–22.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2002). Evidence-based practice. Nursing Standard, 17(14), 47–52. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320
Holloway, I. (2017). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (Fourth edition). Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. (2017). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (Fourth edition). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
Improving the quality of quantitative research reports: A call for action. (2011). Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(4), 387–394. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658
Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2008). A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), 102–109. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. (2012). First day in clinical practice: Evaluating stress of nursing students and their ways to cope with it. Healthmed. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it
Lee, P. (2006). Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Nursing Times, 102(28), 28–30. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Meadows, K.A. (2003). So you want to do research? 1: an overview of the research process. British Journal Of Community Nursing, 8(8), 369–375. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984
Motulsky, H. (2014). Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking (Third edition). Oxford University Press.
Moule, P. (2015). Making sense of research in nursing, health and social care (Fifth edition). SAGE.
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. (2017). Nursing research: an introduction (3rd edition). SAGE.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (n.d.). NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. (2011). The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1176–1197. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. (n.d.-c). Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html
Overseas Development Institute (ODI). (n.d.-d). Planning tools: Problem Tree Analysis. http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis
Parahoo, K. (2014a). Nursing research: principles, process and issues (Third edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
Parahoo, K. (2014b). Nursing research: principles, process and issues (Third edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
Phillips, J. (2013). Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems. Nursing Times, 109(15), 18–20. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Polit, D.F. (2017). Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (Tenth edit). Wolters Kluwer Health.
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (2017). Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice (Ninth edition). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. (2019). Evaluating research in academic journals: a practical guide to realistic evaluation (Seventh edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research: using research in evidence-based practice (3rd ed). Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. (2006a). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard, 20(44), 41–45. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. (2006b). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard, 20(44), 41–45. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
Rolfe, R. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304–310. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. (2007). Supporting evidence-based service delivery and organisation: a comparison of an emergent realistic appraisal technique with a standard qualitative critical appraisal tool. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 5(4), 477–486. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x
Szyjka, S. (2012). Understanding reseach paradigms: trends in science education research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 43, 110–118. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live
Thomas, E. (2004). An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: describing and presenting data. Musculoskeletal Care, 2(4), 218–228. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079
Thomas, E. (2005). An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: Hypothesis tests and estimation. Musculoskeletal Care, 3(2), 102–108. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. (2005). How to conduct an effective literature search. (cover story). Nursing Standard, 20(11), 41–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
University of Reading. (n.d.-e). Doing your literature search. http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx
Value Based Management.net. (n.d.-f). Summary of McKinsey’s 7S model. http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html
Vogt, W.P. (2005). Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences (3rd ed). SAGE. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. (2016). The SAGE dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences (Fifth edition). SAGE.
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. (2006). A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(6), 656–660. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012
