[1]
Aveyard, H., Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide, Fourth edition. London, England: McGraw Hill Education, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989
[2]
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L., The evidence-based practice manual for nurses, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
[3]
Ellis, P., Understanding research for nursing students. Exeter: Learning Matters, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
[4]
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J., The research process in nursing, Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
[5]
Greenhalgh, T., How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine, Fifth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418
[6]
Parahoo, K., Nursing research: principles, process and issues, Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
[7]
‘CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.casp-uk.net/
[8]
‘Centre for Health Evidence’. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109
[9]
‘Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York’. [Online]. Available: http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/
[10]
‘National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nice.org.uk/
[11]
Ellis, P., Understanding research for nursing students. Exeter: Learning Matters, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104
[12]
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L., The evidence-based practice manual for nurses, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691
[13]
Parahoo, K., Nursing research: principles, process and issues, Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505
[14]
Roberts, P. and Priest, H., ‘Reliability and validity in research.’, Nursing standard, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 41–45, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
[15]
Hewitt-Taylor, J., ‘Evidence-based practice’, Nursing Standard, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 47–52, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320
[16]
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J., ‘Who am I and what am I doing? Becoming a qualitative research interviewer.’, Nurse Researcher, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 7–16, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741
[17]
Holloway, I., Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare, Fourth edition. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
[18]
Szyjka, S., ‘Understanding reseach paradigms: trends in science education research’, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 43, pp. 110–118, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live
[19]
Vogt, W.P., Dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml
[20]
Ingham-Broomfield, R., ‘A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research.’, Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375
[21]
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V., ‘The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1176–1197, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372
[22]
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G., ‘Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation’, Nurse Education Today, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. e1–e7, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954
[23]
Hek, G., ‘Evidence-based practice: finding the evidence’, Journal of Community Nursing, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 19–22, 2000.
[24]
Cranston, M., ‘Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice’, Nursing Standard, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 39–43, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161
[25]
Meadows, K.A., ‘So you want to do research? 1: an overview of the research process.’, British Journal Of Community Nursing, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 369–375, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984
[26]
‘Improving the quality of quantitative research reports: A call for action’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658
[27]
Rolfe, R., ‘Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776
[28]
L. Facchiano and C. Hoffman Snyder, ‘Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part three: Critical appraisal process’, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 704–715, Dec. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00752.x.
[29]
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P., ‘Supporting evidence-based service delivery and organisation: a comparison of an emergent realistic appraisal technique with a standard qualitative critical appraisal tool’, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 477–486, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x
[30]
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E., ‘First day in clinical practice: Evaluating stress of nursing students and their ways to cope with it’, Healthmed, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it
[31]
Coolican, H., Research methods and statistics in psychology, Seventh edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945
[32]
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J., The research process in nursing, Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522
[33]
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K., Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare, Fourth edition. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286
[34]
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F., ‘Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research.’, British Journal of Nursing, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 658–663, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395
[35]
Goodman, B., ‘Crunch the numbers.’, Nursing Standard, vol. 22, no. 29, pp. 49–49, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site
[36]
Jamieson, S., ‘Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.’, Medical Education, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1217–1218, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461
[37]
Lee, P., ‘Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers’, Nursing Times, vol. 102, no. 28, pp. 28–30, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
[38]
Roberts, P. and Priest, H., ‘Reliability and validity in research.’, Nursing standard, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 41–45, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site
[39]
Thomas, E., ‘An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: describing and presenting data.’, Musculoskeletal Care, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 218–228, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079
[40]
Thomas, E., ‘An introduction to medical statistics for health care professionals: Hypothesis tests and estimation.’, Musculoskeletal Care, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 102–108, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543
[41]
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M., ‘A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests’, Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 656–660, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012
[42]
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E., ‘Reflecting on nurses’ views on using research in practice.’, British Journal of Nursing, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1341–1346, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486
[43]
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, ‘Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys’. [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html
[44]
Phillips, J., ‘Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems’, Nursing Times, vol. 109, no. 15, pp. 18–20, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
[45]
Overseas Development Institute (ODI), ‘Planning tools: Problem Tree Analysis’. [Online]. Available: http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis
[46]
Value Based Management.net, ‘Summary of McKinsey’s 7S model’. [Online]. Available: http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html
[47]
De Montfort University, ‘How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects’. [Online]. Available: http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf
[48]
University of Reading, ‘Doing your literature search’. [Online]. Available: http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx
[49]
CASP International, ‘www.caspinternational.org’. [Online]. Available: http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf
[50]
‘Checklist - Evaluating qualitative research studies’. [Online]. Available: http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf
[51]
Anderson, C., ‘Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research.’, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1–7, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069
[52]
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M., Evaluating research in academic journals: a practical guide to realistic evaluation, Seventh edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225
[53]
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C., ‘How to conduct an effective literature search. (cover story)’, Nursing Standard, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 41–47, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
[54]
Greenhalgh, T., ‘How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers’, BMJ, vol. 315, no. 7103, pp. 305–308, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305
[55]
Greenhalgh, T., ‘How to read a paper : getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about)’, BMJ, vol. 315, no. 7102, pp. 243–246, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243
[56]
Greenhalgh, T., ‘How to read a paper: The Medline database’, BMJ, vol. 315, no. 7101, pp. 180–183, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760
[57]
Greenhalgh, T., ‘How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests’, BMJ, vol. 315, no. 7104, pp. 364–366, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364
[58]
Ellis, P., Evidence-based practice in nursing, Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters, 2019.
[59]
Ellis, P., Understanding research for nursing students, Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters, 2018.
[60]
Motulsky, H., Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking, Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[61]
Moule, P., Making sense of research in nursing, health and social care, Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[62]
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L., Nursing research: an introduction, 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2017.
[63]
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T., Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice, Ninth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017.
[64]
Polit, D.F., Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, Tenth edit. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2017.
[65]
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S., Understanding nursing research: using research in evidence-based practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
[66]
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B., The SAGE dictionary of statistics & methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences, Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.
