Anderson, C. ‘Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research.’ American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 74.8 (2010): 1–7. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069>.
Aveyard, H. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide. Fourth edition. London, England: McGraw Hill Education, 2019. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989>.
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. ‘Who Am I and What Am I Doing? Becoming a Qualitative Research Interviewer.’ Nurse Researcher 17.3 (2010): 7–16. Web. <https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741>.
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. ‘Developing a Framework for Critiquing Health Research: An Early Evaluation’. Nurse Education Today 31.8 (2011): e1–e7. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954>.
‘CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.casp-uk.net/>.
CASP International. ‘Www.Caspinternational.Org’. Web. <http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf>.
‘Centre for Health Evidence’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109>.
‘Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/>.
‘Checklist - Evaluating Qualitative Research Studies’. Web. <http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf>.
Coolican, H. Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Seventh edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945>.
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. ‘Step-by-Step Guide to Critiquing Research. Part 1: Quantitative Research.’ British Journal of Nursing 16.11 (2007): 658–663. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395>.
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. The Evidence-Based Practice Manual for Nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier, 2011. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691>.
---. The Evidence-Based Practice Manual for Nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier, 2011. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691>.
Cranston, M. ‘Clinical Effectiveness and Evidence-Based Practice’. Nursing Standard 16.24 (2002): 39–43. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161>.
De Montfort University. ‘How to Undertake a Literature Search and Review for Dissertations and Final Year Projects’. Web. <http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf>.
Ellis, P. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters, 2019. Print.
---. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Exeter: Learning Matters, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104>.
---. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Exeter: Learning Matters, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104>.
---. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters, 2018. Print.
Facchiano, Lynda, and Charlene Hoffman Snyder. ‘Evidence-Based Practice for the Busy Nurse Practitioner: Part Three: Critical Appraisal Process’. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 24.12 (2012): 704–715. Web.
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. The Research Process in Nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522>.
---. The Research Process in Nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522>.
Goodman, B. ‘Crunch the Numbers.’ Nursing Standard 22.29 (2008): 49–49. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site>.
Greenhalgh, T. ‘How to Read a Paper: Assessing the Methodological Quality of Published Papers’. BMJ 315.7103 (1997): 305–308. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305>.
---. ‘How to Read a Paper : Getting Your Bearings (Deciding What the Paper Is About)’. BMJ 315.7102 (1997): 243–246. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243>.
---. ‘How to Read a Paper: Statistics for the Non-Statistician. I: Different Types of Data Need Different Statistical Tests’. BMJ 315.7104 (1997): 364–366. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364>.
---. How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine. Fifth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418>.
---. ‘How to Read a Paper: The Medline Database’. BMJ 315.7101 (1997): 180–183. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760>.
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. ‘Reflecting on Nurses’ Views on Using Research in Practice.’ British Journal of Nursing 21.22 (2012): 1341–1346. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486>.
Hek, G. ‘Evidence-Based Practice: Finding the Evidence’. Journal of Community Nursing 14.11 (2000): 19–22. Print.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. ‘Evidence-Based Practice’. Nursing Standard 17.14 (2002): 47–52. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320>.
Holloway, I. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. Fourth edition. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell, 2017. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286>.
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. Fourth edition. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286>.
‘Improving the Quality of Quantitative Research Reports: A Call for Action’. Human Resource Development Quarterly 22.4 (2011): 387–394. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658>.
Ingham-Broomfield, R. ‘A Nurses’ Guide to the Critical Reading of Research.’ Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 26.1 (2008): 102–109. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375>.
Jamieson, S. ‘Likert Scales: How to (Ab)Use Them.’ Medical Education 38.12 (2004): 1217–1218. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461>.
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. ‘First Day in Clinical Practice: Evaluating Stress of Nursing Students and Their Ways to Cope with It’. Healthmed (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it>.
Lee, P. ‘Understanding and Critiquing Quantitative Research Papers’. Nursing Times 102.28 (2006): 28–30. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft>.
Meadows, K.A. ‘So You Want to Do Research? 1: An Overview of the Research Process.’ British Journal Of Community Nursing 8.8 (2003): 369–375. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984>.
Motulsky, H. Intuitive Biostatistics: A Nonmathematical Guide to Statistical Thinking. Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.
Moule, P. Making Sense of Research in Nursing, Health and Social Care. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015. Print.
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. Nursing Research: An Introduction. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2017. Print.
‘National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)’. NICE, n.d. Web. <http://www.nice.org.uk/>.
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. ‘The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice’. British Journal of Social Work 41.6 (2011): 1176–1197. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372>.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. ‘Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html>.
Overseas Development Institute (ODI). ‘Planning Tools: Problem Tree Analysis’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis>.
Parahoo, K. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505>.
---. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505>.
Phillips, J. ‘Using Fishbone Analysis to Investigate Problems’. Nursing Times 109.15 (2013): 18–20. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft>.
Polit, D.F. Nursing Research : Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Tenth edit. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2017. Print.
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Ninth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017. Print.
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. Evaluating Research in Academic Journals: A Practical Guide to Realistic Evaluation. Seventh edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. Web. <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225>.
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. Understanding Nursing Research: Using Research in Evidence-Based Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011. Print.
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. ‘Reliability and Validity in Research.’ Nursing standard 20.44 (2006): 41–45. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site>.
---. ‘Reliability and Validity in Research.’ Nursing standard 20.44 (2006): 41–45. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site>.
Rolfe, R. ‘Validity, Trustworthiness and Rigour: Quality and the Idea of Qualitative Research’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53.3 (2006): 304–310. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776>.
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. ‘Supporting Evidence-Based Service Delivery and Organisation: A Comparison of an Emergent Realistic Appraisal Technique with a Standard Qualitative Critical Appraisal Tool’. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 5.4 (2007): 477–486. Web. <https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x>.
Szyjka, S. ‘Understanding Reseach Paradigms: Trends in Science Education Research’. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 43 (2012): 110–118. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live>.
Thomas, E. ‘An Introduction to Medical Statistics for Health Care Professionals: Describing and Presenting Data.’ Musculoskeletal Care 2.4 (2004): 218–228. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079>.
---. ‘An Introduction to Medical Statistics for Health Care Professionals: Hypothesis Tests and Estimation.’ Musculoskeletal Care 3.2 (2005): 102–108. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543>.
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. ‘How to Conduct an Effective Literature Search. (Cover Story)’. Nursing Standard 20.11 (2005): 41–47. Web. <https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010>.
University of Reading. ‘Doing Your Literature Search’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx>.
Value Based Management.net. ‘Summary of McKinsey’s 7S Model’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html>.
Vogt, W.P. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2005. Web. <https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml>.
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016. Print.
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. ‘A Clinician-Educator’s Roadmap to Choosing and Interpreting Statistical Tests’. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21.6 (2006): 656–660. Web. <https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012>.
