Anderson, C. 2010. ‘Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research.’ American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 74 (8): 1–7. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/704714069.
Aveyard, H. 2019. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide. Fourth edition. London, England: McGraw Hill Education. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1053574989.
Bulpitt, H. and Martin, P.J. 2010. ‘Who Am I and What Am I Doing? Becoming a Qualitative Research Interviewer.’ Nurse Researcher 17 (3): 7–16. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.04.17.3.7.c7741.
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L. and Taylor, G. 2011. ‘Developing a Framework for Critiquing Health Research: An Early Evaluation’. Nurse Education Today 31 (8): e1–7. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5903010954.
‘CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme)’. n.d. http://www.casp-uk.net/.
CASP International. n.d. ‘Www.Caspinternational.Org’. http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf.
‘Centre for Health Evidence’. n.d. https://www.nature.com/articles/6400109.
‘Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York’. n.d. http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/.
‘Checklist - Evaluating Qualitative Research Studies’. n.d. http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/1532/1569569/checklists/chap07b.pdf.
Coolican, H. 2019. Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Seventh edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1079201945.
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. and Ryan, F. 2007. ‘Step-by-Step Guide to Critiquing Research. Part 1: Quantitative Research.’ British Journal of Nursing 16 (11): 658–63. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/160007395.
Craig, J.V. and Smyth, R.L. 2011a. The Evidence-Based Practice Manual for Nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691.
———. 2011b. The Evidence-Based Practice Manual for Nurses. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchhill Livingstone Elsevier. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1721691.
Cranston, M. 2002. ‘Clinical Effectiveness and Evidence-Based Practice’. Nursing Standard 16 (24): 39–43. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdf/10.7748/ns2002.02.16.24.39.c3161.
De Montfort University. n.d. ‘How to Undertake a Literature Search and Review for Dissertations and Final Year Projects’. http://www.library.dmu.ac.uk/Images/Howto/LiteratureSearch.pdf.
Ellis, P. 2010a. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Exeter: Learning Matters. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104.
———. 2010b. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Exeter: Learning Matters. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=680104.
———. 2018. Understanding Research for Nursing Students. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters.
———. 2019. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: Learning Matters.
Facchiano, Lynda, and Charlene Hoffman Snyder. 2012. ‘Evidence-Based Practice for the Busy Nurse Practitioner: Part Three: Critical Appraisal Process’. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 24 (12): 704–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00752.x.
Gerrish, K. and Lathlean, J. 2015a. The Research Process in Nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522.
———. 2015b. The Research Process in Nursing. Seventh edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1313862522.
Goodman, B. 2008. ‘Crunch the Numbers.’ Nursing Standard 22 (29): 49–49. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105914080&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Greenhalgh, T. 1997a. ‘How to Read a Paper: Assessing the Methodological Quality of Published Papers’. BMJ 315 (7103): 305–8. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305.
———. 1997b. ‘How to Read a Paper : Getting Your Bearings (Deciding What the Paper Is About)’. BMJ 315 (7102): 243–46. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7102/243.
———. 1997c. ‘How to Read a Paper: Statistics for the Non-Statistician. I: Different Types of Data Need Different Statistical Tests’. BMJ 315 (7104): 364–66. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7104/364.
———. 1997d. ‘How to Read a Paper: The Medline Database’. BMJ 315 (7101): 180–83. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5855936760.
———. 2014. How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine. Fifth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1642418.
Heaslip, V., Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Rowe, N.E. 2012. ‘Reflecting on Nurses’ Views on Using Research in Practice.’ British Journal of Nursing 21 (22): 1341–46. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5813493486.
Hek, G. 2000. ‘Evidence-Based Practice: Finding the Evidence’. Journal of Community Nursing 14 (11): 19–22.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. 2002. ‘Evidence-Based Practice’. Nursing Standard 17 (14): 47–52. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns2002.12.17.14.47.c3320.
Holloway, I. 2017. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. Fourth edition. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286.
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K. 2017. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. Fourth edition. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/965607286.
‘Improving the Quality of Quantitative Research Reports: A Call for Action’. 2011. Human Resource Development Quarterly 22 (4): 387–94. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155057658.
Ingham-Broomfield, R. 2008. ‘A Nurses’ Guide to the Critical Reading of Research.’ Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 26 (1): 102–9. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/7128380375.
Jamieson, S. 2004. ‘Likert Scales: How to (Ab)Use Them.’ Medical Education 38 (12): 1217–18. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4599858461.
Karabacak, U., Uslusoy, E.C., Senturan, L. and Alpar, S.E. 2012. ‘First Day in Clinical Practice: Evaluating Stress of Nursing Students and Their Ways to Cope with It’. Healthmed. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289481269_First_day_in_clinical_practice_Evaluating_stress_of_nursing_students_and_their_ways_to_cope_with_it.
Lee, P. 2006. ‘Understanding and Critiquing Quantitative Research Papers’. Nursing Times 102 (28): 28–30. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-200607110-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft.
Meadows, K.A. 2003. ‘So You Want to Do Research? 1: An Overview of the Research Process.’ British Journal Of Community Nursing 8 (8): 369–75. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/112112984.
Motulsky, H. 2014. Intuitive Biostatistics: A Nonmathematical Guide to Statistical Thinking. Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moule, P. 2015. Making Sense of Research in Nursing, Health and Social Care. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Moule, P., Aveyard, H. and Goodman, M.L. 2017. Nursing Research: An Introduction. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
‘National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)’. n.d. NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/.
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. 2011. ‘The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice’. British Journal of Social Work 41 (6): 1176–97. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5113553372.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. n.d. ‘Root Cause Analysis Using Five Whys’. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121116081144/https://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/identifying_problems_-_root_cause_analysis_using5_whys.html.
Overseas Development Institute (ODI). n.d. ‘Planning Tools: Problem Tree Analysis’. http://www.odi.org/publications/5258-problem-tree-analysis.
Parahoo, K. 2014a. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505.
———. 2014b. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/874930505.
Phillips, J. 2013. ‘Using Fishbone Analysis to Investigate Problems’. Nursing Times 109 (15): 18–20. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006203-201304160-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft.
Polit, D.F. 2017. Nursing Research : Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Tenth edit. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. 2017. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Ninth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Pyrczak, F. and Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. 2019. Evaluating Research in Academic Journals: A Practical Guide to Realistic Evaluation. Seventh edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/Bournemouth-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5574225.
Rebar, C.R., Gersch, C.J., Macnee, C.L. and McCabe, S. 2011. Understanding Nursing Research: Using Research in Evidence-Based Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Roberts, P. and Priest, H. 2006a. ‘Reliability and Validity in Research.’ Nursing Standard 20 (44): 41–45. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site.
———. 2006b. ‘Reliability and Validity in Research.’ Nursing Standard 20 (44): 41–45. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106336170&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Rolfe, R. 2006. ‘Validity, Trustworthiness and Rigour: Quality and the Idea of Qualitative Research’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53 (3): 304–10. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5155955776.
Satherley, P., Allen, D. and Lyne, P. 2007. ‘Supporting Evidence-Based Service Delivery and Organisation: A Comparison of an Emergent Realistic Appraisal Technique with a Standard Qualitative Critical Appraisal Tool’. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 5 (4): 477–86. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00062.x.
Szyjka, S. 2012. ‘Understanding Reseach Paradigms: Trends in Science Education Research’. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 43: 110–18. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s7547708&direct=true&db=eue&AN=77924598&site=ehost-live.
Thomas, E. 2004. ‘An Introduction to Medical Statistics for Health Care Professionals: Describing and Presenting Data.’ Musculoskeletal Care 2 (4): 218–28. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019079.
———. 2005. ‘An Introduction to Medical Statistics for Health Care Professionals: Hypothesis Tests and Estimation.’ Musculoskeletal Care 3 (2): 102–8. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156019543.
Timmins, F. and McCabe, C. 2005. ‘How to Conduct an Effective Literature Search. (Cover Story)’. Nursing Standard 20 (11): 41–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010.
University of Reading. n.d. ‘Doing Your Literature Search’. http://www.reading.ac.uk/library/finding-info/guides/literature-searching/lib-literature-searching.aspx.
Value Based Management.net. n.d. ‘Summary of McKinsey’s 7S Model’. http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_7S.html.
Vogt, W.P. 2005. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE. https://bournemouth.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/dictionary-of-statistics-methodology/SAGE.xml.
Vogt, W.P. and Johnson, B. 2016. The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Windish, D.M. and Diener-West, M. 2006. ‘A Clinician-Educator’s Roadmap to Choosing and Interpreting Statistical Tests’. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21 (6): 656–60. https://bournemouth.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5156962012.
